ivike000,
Surgery to remove/reduce male breasts has a high rate of patients who are less than thrilled with the results even under the best of conditions.
Sorry, I do not belive this is accurate. The literature, doctors who have communicated to me, and my experience just do not agree. My patients satisfaction rate that they express to me has been extraordinary. I ask each patient how they like their new chests after surgery, and the response has been almost unanimous "I love my new chest." The basic literature satisfaction rate is very high for gynecomastia surgery. My best guess for my patients is somewhere about a 99% satisfaction rate from what has been told to me and my staff. The most common statement I hear from my patients when I ask them about their results has been "as good or better from what I expected."
The rate of satisfaction of posters in some internet forums can be much less. Unhappy people tend to post looking for information, advice, and help. Some chose to help others and answer questions about their experiences. Happy patients usually move on, the gynecomastia experiences for them, a thing of the past.
ivike000,You can improve the possibility of a successful outcome by: 1) Being a Good surgical candidate.[Through puberty, growth complete, apropriate weight, hormones normal] 2) Using the services of the best Surgeon available. 3) Having a reasonable expectation of the surgical outcome.
These statements are what makes the difference in success.
For the better surgeon, patient selection is a major factor. If I operated on every patient that came to me, my patient satisfaction rate would not be as good. Not all patients are reasonable candidates for surgery. That is why we spend so much effort evaluating each patient before continuing with surgical options.
In other cases, surgeon skill is another issue. I have seen disasters from misadventures from around the world. The worst have been from doctors who had no training, or were not board certified, or just had bad track records. It can be a function of public responsibility to check on their doctors. Why a patient would think that a Gynecologist would do a good job with Gynecomastia is beyond me when that doctor did not have any before / after images to show. The same goes for problems from Emergency Room doctors who now want to call themselves "plastic surgeons." I have also heard dissatisfied patients reporting that their doctor said "boards are not important," and call themselves plastic surgeons anyway. We doctors try to police ourselves by setting up organizations that require training, continuing education, and ethical behavior for membership. Yet I see many patients who have had surgery by doctors who could not qualify for membership.
For some it is reasonable expectations. Everything has limitations. Medicine and Surgery are no exceptions. Words expressed alone by themselves just are not enough to understand an individual's problem. Evaluating a patients' concerns after surgery needs to include looking at the problem before surgery, what was done, the recovery, and what it looks like after surgery. This process is best in person when tissues can be examined, felt, and watched moving. The next best option is using
standardized images that permit the contour to be evaluated from many different angles and to see how movement and tensing muscles can change the contour. I have seen patients from other doctors coming to me to remove more tissue, that their breasts were still too big. Yet there was nothing there, just skin adherent to muscle a
cavity defect and depression.
Before considering any advice or complaints from someone that posts in a forum, careful evaluation of before and after images / movies can be very important.Of course no surgeon can guarantee results.
Hope this helps,
Michael Bermant, MD
Learn More About Gynecomastia and Chest Sculpture