Author Topic: Vaserlipo/ liposelection as an option.. PLS HELP ME :(  (Read 3273 times)

Offline Moses

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4
Hi there, I have a question regarding whether I should consider vaserlipo or lipo selection as a surgical option.. I've seen a documentary video on youtube, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3uTMqz0IYbc(this is the link) and the surgeon said that ultrasound, in other words vaserlipo is not effective and also that ultrasound has been a disappointment.. Is that true? What are the worst case scenarios, feedbacks that can happen if I so happen decide to go through with vaserlipo surgery..

I'm 18yrs old and I have been suffering from gynecomastia for almost 6 years now.. I'm not overweight or fat or anything, I'm pretty fit.. I've seen an endocrinologist about my condition and he did some hormone tests and said that my hormones are normal, nothing unusual.. so he asked me questions about what drugs I have used or what I think I did that might be considered as a factor then I told him about my gyne appearing after regular eating of hormone-injected chickens and he said that that could possibly be the cause of my gynecomastia.. Is it possible? Cause I've been eating it very often back then and true enough "i think" my chest stopped growing after I stopped eating it which was probably 4-5 yrs ago and it has maintained the same size eversince until I started working out last year and it is becoming more visible.

DrBermant

  • Guest
Hi there, I have a question regarding whether I should consider vaserlipo or lipo selection as a surgical option.. I've seen a documentary video on youtube, and the surgeon said that ultrasound, in other words vaserlipo is not effective and also that ultrasound has been a disappointment.. Is that true? What are the worst case scenarios, feedbacks that can happen if I so happen decide to go through with vaserlipo surgery..

I'm 18yrs old and I have been suffering from gynecomastia for almost 6 years now.. I'm not overweight or fat or anything, I'm pretty fit.. I've seen an endocrinologist about my condition and he did some hormone tests and said that my hormones are normal, nothing unusual.. so he asked me questions about what drugs I have used or what I think I did that might be considered as a factor then I told him about my gyne appearing after regular eating of hormone-injected chickens and he said that that could possibly be the cause of my gynecomastia.. Is it possible? Cause I've been eating it very often back then and true enough "i think" my chest stopped growing after I stopped eating it which was probably 4-5 yrs ago and it has maintained the same size eversince until I started working out last year and it is becoming more visible.
Liposuction Is Great for Sculpting Fat

Various types of ultrasonic and power assisted liposuction (UAL and PAL) have been around for quite some time.  Each surgeon uses the tools and techniques he / she prefers.

There are studies claiming that ultrasonic liposuction does not break down gland cells, these were done to justify the safety in female liposuction breast reduction surgery.  Ultrasonic energy cannot be both ways, good for gland breakdown and safe not harming gland unless there is a difference between male and female breast gland tissue which has not been proven to my knowledge.

Tumescent liposuction is a form of anesthesia where fluid is placed in the tissues to be sculpted.  You can see very graphic pictures of the tumecent technique here.

Liposuction such as ultrasonic, VASER, power assisted, and sharp cutting cannula preferentially remove fat over gland.  Gland tends to exist under the nipple areola region.  When fingers of fat extend between fingers of gland, breast reduction can come from removing the fat and leaving gland behind.  On animation such as flexing the pectoral muscles or putting the arms over head, gland does not compress or move like fat.

When gynecomastia is from fat, liposuction works very well for contouring the chest.  I have seen many patients from other doctors who tried to use liposuction alone techniques that left gland behind that the patients just did not like for Revision Gynecomastia Chest Sculpture.

Here is an example of Revision Surgery after Liposuction alone.  

Here is another revision after liposuction alone.

I have seen just too many unhappy patients with puffy nipples remaining after axilla or armpit attempts alone using sharp cutting cannula or other such instruments by other doctors.  Check out this drawing of Puffy Nipple Anatomy after Remote Gland Removal Drawing.

The problem is picking the right method for what actually is that patient's problem.  That is why I prefer my Dynamic Technique that permits what I find during surgery to guide my sculpture.  The incision at the edge of the areola  opens up my entire spectrum of artist's pallet of tools for my sculpture.  A remote incision robs me of many options and just does not looks as nice.  I prefer to avoid this unnecessary additional scar.

I have also seen patients with channel problems between remote access sites and the areola / nipple.  Scars, adhesions, and depressions can look terrible.  Check out the lateral (side views) and posterior oblique (side from the back views with and without muscle flexion here to see what I mean.

Ultrasonic liposuction uses energy to help emulsify fat.  Power assisted liposuction uses mechanical vibrating devices to rapidly move the cannula back and forth.  Both PAL and Ultrasonic methods have been around for several years.  Many do not prefer what they do to the tissue.  Others like what they offer.  Both still preferentially remove fat over gland.  Both make the work of the surgeon easier.  Some feel ultrasonic liposuction can cause more swelling, bruising, and the increase the need for drains.

For a liposuction cannula to remove gland, it can also remove connective tissue and other structures which can lead to more bruising and scars.  I have seen so many patients who were unhappy from doctors that used "special cannula to remove gland," that I just prefer to go directly to the problem itself.  Primary surgery is usually better than needing a revision.  All male breasts have gland.  With access to the gland directly, I can peel it off the areola muscle, minimize bruising and bleeding with direct control of the tiny blood vessels, and then reconstruct the contour.

For me however, they also both remove the feel of the tissue sculpture.  I like the much better control I get with my cannula selection and personally I do not like either ultrasonic nor power assisted techniques.  None of the cases on my website used either PAL, Ultrasonic, nor sharp cutting cannula techniques.  

As any artist, I take my cannula selection very seriously and have evolved what permits me to achieve my results.  I have considered and evaluated many, many technologies.  The many different types of cannula I use have their own advantages and qualities.  I pick a subset of these cannula that varies for the many different types of gynecomastia male chest sculpture that I see.

Gland removal by any technique can still leave a depression when  a major part of the problem is from gland.  For gland removal, I prefer the greater precision of removal under direct visualization and feel.  This also give me access to many more elements for my artistic palette of my Dynamic Technique to sculpt the remaining tissues.

This approach permits me to maximize the removal of the firm gland and sculpt the remaining fat.  How tissues move is important.  The human body is beautiful in animation.  That is why I show pictures of the chest with arms up, down, and with muscles tight / relaxed in addition to the results from multiple views.  Such analysis of the results as well as how tissues evolve, the possible need for drains, comfort level after surgery, are important factors in picking your doctor.  It is like an artist selecting a paint brush.  The results are what matters, not with what tool they sculpt.

Hope this helps,

Michael Bermant, MD
Learn More aboutGynecomastia and Chest Sculpture
« Last Edit: September 14, 2009, 08:21:23 AM by DrBermant »


 

SMFPacks CMS 1.0.3 © 2024