I am 17, 5' 10" and about 160 lbs, how bad?

[ipodtouch]

Hi,
my pics available here:

http://img516.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img0039zf4.jpg
http://img515.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img0041st8.jpg
http://img242.imageshack.us/my.php?image=img0042ra3.jpg


Pls rate the pictures on a scale of 1 to 5.
1-ok
2-not ok but not bad
3-bad
4-very bad
5-severe..

also pls tell me what they look like in terms of shape:
1-no fat & no boobs
2-looks like some fat..
3-looks like  boobs at some angles but still not bad
4-looks like boobs at some angles but looks bad
5-looks like boobs at all but not bad
6-looks like boobs at all angles and bad

Thanks

[ipodtouch]

anyone?

[RyanMace]

Very mild case. I don't like rating pics, because the number doesn't really ease the pain. But, as I said, it's a very mild case, and I'd rate it at about 2/10.

[nuttynuts]

i reckon that might even sort it self out hey, i reckon u should wait it out... =)

if it dosnt sort itself out, that would be EASILY fixed up with procedure.. either way.. ur results coming will be GREAT 

wish mine was as nice/not as bad as urse dude 

[Paa_Paw]

I'd guess glandular growth directly behind the nipple with little to no fat involvement. This kind of situation can be sculpted by a good surgeon, but calls for a very well qualified surgeon.

We seldom get complaints from people who had major breast reduction. Those who are seeking help and or revision are more commonly people with this type of problem. Removing insufficient tissue is no help while removing too much leaves a crater. Unless you get a really good surgeon, it would probably be best left alone.