The male and female body (contrary to the contemporary psudo-science) are in fact quite different.
Women have typically (though not entirely) smaller statures, wider cheek bones, wider legs, thicker thighs, etc; outside the obvious.
One of the key areas is the pelvis. Designed to carry baby, the pelvic region is distinctly different from a male in several ways.
Including wider and shallower than a male and bowel shaped to carry a child.
Additionally, women's legs are wider apart and create a "Q" angle that is substantially wider than a male, again for baby.
The one thing that makes a woman's lower end also distinctive is something called the gluteal fold (aka gluteal cut) and other names.
This is where the legs meet the butt at the bottom. The distinctive shape is a common fetish point for men (and women) and helps create the round shape that is akin to female.
That distance from the belt line to the gluteal fold is also shorter on a female than male.
When normalized against a male body, the female body shows that distinctiveness. Women's pants are cut for the hips and the gluteal fold. Men are just straight down.
Last year I started buying women's pants because I was curious and moreover, they fit.
I finally figured out what the reason was, and that I have acquiesced.
Mens pants never fit me correctly and drapped especially around my backside and it looked sloppy and unattractive.
Now, wearing women's pants they fit better, form around by body and are proportional to my body shape.
I don't have the hips as large (I hope I eventually do) and curve out.
But at least I don't look like a slob walking around.
Whats your take?
