I have to bring this up since there's so much talk here about mammograms. Mammograms' radiation is a thousand times as much as you get in a chest X-ray, increasing your risk of breast cancer by 2% each time you have it done, and they result in a lot of false positives, producing unnecessary emotional trauma plus invasive and avoidable biopsies.
Instead, go for
thermograms. They are more sensitive, more accurate, less expensive, painless, and cannot cause any harm, even to pregnant or nursing women.
some relevant links I have bookmarked:
https://thetruthaboutcancer.com/mammograms-breast-cancer-test/ https://www.healthy-holistic-living.com/thermograms-safer-accurate-mammograms/ https://www.naturalnews.com/043960_thermograms_breast_cancer_mammograms.html From the last article linked there:
"Significantly, in the case of breast cancer,
thermograms can flag out cancer development five years before mammograms are able to do so. It does so by showing up the early stages of angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels which is a necessary precursor to tumor formation. Most breast tumors would have been slowly growing for up to two decades before conventional diagnostic methods can detect them. And at the earlier stages of development,
cancer tumors are relatively easy to stop and reverse."
And:
"[Mammography's] radiation tends to
increase breast cancer risk, possibly quite significantly, especially if undertaken annually, as radiation could have cumulative carcinogenic effects. Also, the physical compression and manipulation of the breasts can cause existent tumors to spread. The rates of false positives and false negatives are high. And it may not even be effective at lowering overall
breast cancer death rates.
"Mammography is not an acceptable way of screening breasts; the only reason it's tolerated is that it is a major source of steady income for radiologists. They have come to covet mammography and want no competition from other approaches," said Philip Hoekstra, PhD, a pioneer in thermogram use."