Author Topic: Anyone else?  (Read 1679 times)

Offline gotgyne

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 352
Has any one else found that sex is better once there are four decent sized breasts in play?
No.
A bra is just an article of clothing for people with breasts.

Normal boobs1

  • Guest
42C
I don't think that anyone needs to apologise for anything written so far in this thread. It is refreshing to have an open and honest exchange.
It has been statements of fact from individuals as to their present body and psychological situation. Privacy has been maintained in areas where folk want it. Inappropriate detail has been left where it belongs  - just facts - some individual some medical and no eroticism.
A real adult consersation

Online Johndoe1

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
I know for some people, male and female, sexual feelings in their breasts do not exist. I think we have seen that here. I have two female friends tell me one can have sexual feelings from breast manipulation and the other has none. And breast size appears to have nothing to do with it, if you catch my drift. I believe the same is true here. And this should not be a surprise since breast tissue is identical no matter the gender. In women they are called breasts. In men it's called gynecomastia. As if by having a penis diminishes the fact that they are breasts.  I wish the term gynecomastia would go away and a breast is called a breast,  no matter the gender. And yes, I enjoy having developed breasts and the fun that comes along with having them. 
Womanhood is not defined by breasts, and breasts are not indicative of womanhood. - Melissa Fabello

Normal boobs1

  • Guest
I too wish that the term gynecomastia was dead and buried. It is a non word for a "condition" that does not exist and does not need treating.
Men with larger breasts are normal.
In the same way women with small breasts also do not have a condition that they need to have corrected.
The insecurities are fanned into flame by society's  prejudices and perceived norms.
Regrettably in both cases it is almost blackmail for both to play fast and loose with their health be it wirh surgery or hormones. It also damages their wealth
« Last Edit: March 10, 2023, 06:26:36 AM by Normal boobs1 »

Offline Evolver

  • Silver Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 248
I too wish that the term gynecomastia was dead and buried. It is a non word for a "condition" that does not exist and does not need treating.
Men with larger breasts are normal.
In the same way women with small breasts also do not have a condition that they need to have corrected.
That's actually a very good point. Men with large breasts, and women with small breasts, may choose to do something about it surgically to make themselves feel good by appeasing people that they don't know, but it is not a need per se.

I am all for unisex everything, including medical terminology. Thank goodness that when men get diagnosed with breast cancer, it is not known as men's breast cancer.

Offline 42CSuprise!

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
I hope you guys realize that attitudes like that will put plastic surgeons out of business... including the man who pays to keep this website alive... :o

I agree, our unique hormonal stew is not a problem... unless we've accepted society's judgments about what it means to be a man or woman or beautiful or ugly.  We know, of course, that few people have the emotional intelligence and personal integrity to not succumb to group pressure in all its forms.  The reason the advertising business is so phenomenally successful is because we are so vulnerable to the messages they give us about what we should drive, wear, eat... look like.  There is no doubt that the focus on acceptance which is the hallmark of this side of a site devoted to fixing "the problem" is where an answer can be found.  I don't need to buy anything or do anything that isn't in alignment with my values.

Yes, I have breasts though I have no interest in flaunting them.  And yes, I enjoy the breasts that now fill the cups of a 42C brassiere.  I like the brassiere as well!  Fortunately, I found a place where I can say such things without being attacked.  Thanks everyone!

Online Johndoe1

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
Lots of other procedures for doctors to make money from!

Offline 42CSuprise!

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 457
I know there is a place for plastic surgeons in this world in which accidents happen and profound abnormalities make life difficult for some... but the big money is made in cosmetic surgery... boob jobs, nose jobs, tummy tucks.  I wasn't a subscriber but I got the flavor of the FX series Nip and Tuck and it wasn't a pretty picture.  I happen to live in a wealthy community and high end plastic surgeons abound.  In fact, I don't live that far from where THIS plastic surgeon does his work.  I guess driving a Bentley can come with silicone breast implants... ::)

Offline Lbrown

  • Posting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 39
To answer OP's original question, yes, four breasts are indeed better than two.

Normal boobs1

  • Guest
 42 C
I suspect that anything said on this side of the forum will not dent the income of the owners of this site to any worrying degree. They probably regard giving us free reign as part of due diligence in getting informed consent for others desire for what is, after is all said and done,  elective cosmetic surgery.
I feel sad that society makes so many men disturbed enough to go through with what I see as unecessary expensive mutilation.
Others opinions will, I accept, vary. 
Peace to all

Offline aboywithgirls

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1408
I am sooooo thankful that I had not elected to have a breast reduction or a double mastectomy. 

My wife.has ALWAYS enjoyed my boobs. I think that even the struggles that I went through as a teen when I had considered having them removed from my body. I could ever seriously consider it. 
Bras aren't for women, they're for breasts.

Offline Exit

  • Posting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
Yes and no.

I did once have a relationship where, yes, having boobs was absolutely a plus, at least for a while.  In the long term, my awkwardness towards having boobs probably contributed to us breaking up and her ending up with a more traditionally masculine guy with an average chest.  When things were going well, yes, it was fun and she and I did a ton of breast play.  I don't think most women are into it, but given my experiences and what others have said on this forum, I think finding a woman who appreciates breasts on her man is achievable.

On the other hand, I eventually got breast reduction surgery.  Part of me misses my boobs, but I'm glad I did it.  Although I could in theory have found someone else who could accept and even like my boobs, dating is already enough of a struggle.  Having a more average masculine chest gave me indescribable amounts of confidence.  Not having boobs also has allowed me to feel way more masculine.  Although I've mostly presented masculine in my life, and I'm pretty sure nobody suspects that I've been anything but masculine, I had some gender confusion for quite a while, and my boobs contributed to that.

Offline Exit

  • Posting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 46
In women they are called breasts. In men it's called gynecomastia. As if by having a penis diminishes the fact that they are breasts.  I wish the term gynecomastia would go away and a breast is called a breast,  no matter the gender.

This is one of the best things I've read in a while.

I totally agree.  Though I don't think it's intentional, the term gynecomastia has a way of assuming there's a pathology.  Because nobody wants to accept that men have breasts too, there's actually guys with totally average male chests who are worried that they have "gyno".  Gynecomastia as a term is useful in a medical context but it's a bit dehumanizing to always use it to refer to male breasts.

People talk all the time about how body image affects women but completely dismiss the body image society places upon men and how that standard keeps getting further out of reach.  We have men paranoid about having "gyno" because nearly all the representations of sexually attractive men in media have a look that is only achievable by working out a ton and probably steroids.  Look at the men portrayed on covers of romance novels and those are nearly all 'roid physiques.  I'm not saying that women should be attracted to men with feminized features like breasts, but that society has an underlying hostility towards cis gendered men with breasts and goes unacknowledged.  Disallowing men to have breasts by dismissing them as "gyno" is callous and is something that would never be accepted towards anyone else.

Offline Moobzie

  • Silver Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
But it's even worse for women - from infancy on females are looked at (quite literally) differently than males.  With us, generally, the focus is on what we do - hence the emphasis on physical strength / prowess.  With the other half of humanity the primary focus is on appearance.  I get this:  with me how a guy looks is not as important as how he does - I don't choose mechanics or plumbers on the basis of their looks.  Women, even when working, are super focused on how they look.  One of the odd things about us guys with developed breasts, curvier bodies, softer muscles and smoother skin is that we start being concerned about our appearance in similar or even the same way.  I never used to give a second thought about what to wear:to the store, mowing the lawn, swimming, etc., etc.  But now!?  Yup - second (or even third !) thoughts.  As I posted in another thread, I've finally started to become comfortable in my shape.  Time and estrogen can do that.

Offline bustymale

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 410
Time and estrogen can do that.

That perfectly describes us and our womanly breasts 


 

SMFPacks CMS 1.0.3 © 2023