Latest update

[taxmapper]

Nope.    

Thats your wanker Gov. at work there bub...   I am wearing a shirt in one and a leather jacket that is ... well... unclosable.   

Nothing explicit.   

But Starmer probably just doesnt like me. 

[Parity]

Taxmapper,  

  Looking at the first photo  I do see a feminine shape. 

  In the second photo  your chest looks more like breast than pecks. 

  I have to agree with your friend,  nice breast!

 I wouldn't argue with you that growth has and is occurring.  I don't think most people would take a second glance.  You look good and I'm glad you are able to be you and just live.  Keep it up.  We know we are different however the with clothing choices we can for the most part keep that to ourselves.  

AlfaQ,  The photos:  The first is from feet to neck.  Wearing blue genes, nice floral button up shirt with a black jacket zipped at waist up 3 inches.   It appears to small to completely zip all the way.
 The second is a shot from the waist to neck in a nice blue button up with a lanyard, ID badge and pen hanging around his neck.  Has a nicely shaped bust not showing any bra outline.  Why it's blocked I have no idea. 

[blad]

Nope.   

Thats your wanker Gov. at work there bub...  I am wearing a shirt in one and a leather jacket that is ... well... unclosable. 

Nothing explicit. 

But Starmer probably just doesnt like me.

So everyone who is not a self righteous republican gets scorned? No wonder the situation the world its in. 

The issue is probably related to some server in Texass.  

[JKing]

Nope.   

Thats your wanker Gov. at work there bub...  I am wearing a shirt in one and a leather jacket that is ... well... unclosable. 

Nothing explicit. 

But Starmer probably just doesnt like me.

So everyone who is not a self righteous republican gets scorned? No wonder the situation the world its in.

The issue is probably related to some server in Texass. 

Wow, that is an unnecessary leap Blad. I don't recall Taxmapper saying his government is better. Your response is very reactionary and based on a false premise that if one disagrees with a specific government they MUST support the other side of the political aisle.  Here is something to ponder. Two different opinions can both be valid. Starmer can be called wanker and also believe that the US President is a wanker as well.  Many of us that are not polarized will criticize political leaders even if they are a part of the political divide we support.  

[WPW717]

Oh no, not the worm can again

🐔or🥚?

[Traveler]

Don’t think Blad made too huge of a leap. If you call someone’s gov a wanker, kinda implies your gov is better. With the state of affairs currently going on in ours, I don’t see how that stands.