Here is another subject that I struggle to deal with as a gynecomastia sufferer....
From reading the posts on this site and on other legitimate medical and bodybuilding related forums, and with as much we know about the condition itself I have to ask the following questions and make the following observations based on my views:
First, I don't buy, not even for a moment, that alcohol, weed, or other drug use, (recreationally and non steroidal) can sufficiently be blamed as a MAJOR contributing factor to the cause of gynecomastia.
Outlying perhaps...
Yes, alcohol and weed and other drugs can make your hormones fluctuate, can lead to a lifestyle of inactivity and increased high risk behavior which may lead to higher body fat composition which could cause some extra and unwanted chest fat (pseudogyno) But I again do not believe that anyone, can comfortable and honestly say that Alcohol or drugs (non steroidal) are without a doubt, a MAJOR contributer to gyno. I think that statement made by many on these boards is a copout and a way for many gyno sufferers to provide an answer to the question "WHY ME?".
I will, at best, agree with the philosophy that we, as men, are in some manner predispositioned to gynecomastia based on genetics, and that alcohol and drug use may be the "last straw" that chemically triggers the glands to grow, which inevitably would anyways because of our cursed genetics but I do not believe that alcohol is a sole contributer (Same with Weed and other recreational drugs).
Poor Genetics, Inactive and unhealthy lifestyle choices (prolonged) along with other Major chemical and hormonal altering drugs would be what I, in my opinion (I am not a Doctor, but do have a degree in Biomolecular Sciences) put the blame on for those of us that suffer from this condition.
NOW.... to the IMPORTANT part of my post
If however, it can be proven that other drugs (prescribed) are the sole or MAJOR contributer to the cause of our gynecomastia where does the blame lie?
1. Us, as the individual for taking the drug, albeit prescribed?
2. Well, what if we were not informed by the M.D. that this was a side effect? Then is he at fault? Is he or could he be liable for covering the cost of the procedure?
3. What if the M.D. was not informed that gynecomastia was a side effect with a high incident rate (>3%)? Should the manufacturer be held responsible? The pharmaceutical representative?
I know we live in a sue happy society, and don't get me wrong, I'm not the type of person who contemplates spilling coffee on himself, or walks into traffic hoping to get hit with the hopes of winning a class action lawsuit, however I do feel like the blame in the above cases, under the right circumstance should not just fall under a "BUYER BEWARE CAVEAT".
I do take responsibility for my actions, and for what I put into my body, but as I stated in another post the only possible things I can attribute to my gynecomastia are:
A. Genetics (No one else in my family has/had it)
B. Decreased exercise, increase alcohol intake (possible, but not to this degree of which I suffer), I still exercise on a regular basis and my alcohol intake is not of concern
C. Drugs/Medication - I took Effexor XR as prescribed by a medical doctor for anxiety that I was suffering from in college. Shortly after I discontinued the meds after a 6 month dose, I noticed the burning sensation that I later identified as gyno (by then it was to late to reverse it) and still suffer from today (still have pain and the gland still is growing, although at a slow pace). It has been three years since I first noticed signs.
Again, I feel like this is a legit medical condition and not just a cosmetic procedure (Topic for another post). I hate to feel like this is all my fault and that I brought this upon myself because I went to get treatment for anxiety that I was suffering from.
So....
Any comments? Ideas?
I would like to know where others think the blame lies... Who should be held responsible? What do you think caused your (our gynecomastia)?
Are we to blame, therefore liable for all medical/surgical costs like the insurance companies like to make us believe?
Discuss....
Thanks for all input