Author Topic: NEED ADVICE ON WHAT A PS SAID  (Read 4601 times)

Offline mc_robbiedawg

  • Posting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32
  • i like the flat- not thick and juicy
hey just had my first consultation with a ps. Im 18 had mild gyne for ever. I have a sort of thin length of gland going from the outside of my nipple towards my armpit and gyne fat.
1)The PS said that becuase its only a small amount of gland he would only need to use lipo and not excision- Is this correct??.
2) He said he uses a power canula as opposed to ultrasonic lipo and he makes incisions at the bottom of the breast. Can anyone comment on this technique?

cheeers rob
greatest looking man in the world- with boobs

DrBermant

  • Guest
Quote
hey just had my first consultation with a ps. Im 18 had mild gyne for ever. I have a sort of thin length of gland going from the outside of my nipple towards my armpit and gyne fat.
1)The PS said that becuase its only a small amount of gland he would only need to use lipo and not excision- Is this correct??.
2) He said he uses a power canula as opposed to ultrasonic lipo and he makes incisions at the bottom of the breast. Can anyone comment on this technique?

cheeers rob


Each surgeon used the tools and techniques he / she prefers.

Tumescent liposuction is a form of anesthesia where fluid is placed in the tissues to be sculpted.  You can see very graphic pictures of the tumecent technique here.

Liposuction such as ultrasonic, power assisted, and sharp cutting cannula preferentially remove fat over gland.  Gland tends to exist under the nipple areola region.  When fingers of fat extend between fingers of gland, breast reduction can come from removing the fat and leaving gland behind.  On animation such as flexing the pectoral muscles or putting the arms over head, gland does not compress or move like fat.

When gynecomastia is from fat, liposuction works very well for contouring the chest.  I have seen many patients from other doctors who tried to use liposuction alone techniques that left gland behind that the patients just did not like.  The problem is picking the right method for what actually is that patient's problem.  That is why I prefer my Dynamic Technique that permits what I find during surgery to guide my sculpture.

I have also seen patients with channel problem between remote access sites and the areola / nipple.  Scars, adhesions, and depressions can look terrible.  Check out the lateral (side views) and posterior oblique (side from the back views with and without muscle flexion here to see what I mean.

Ultrasonic liposuction uses energy to help emulsify fat.  Power assisted liposuction uses mechanical vibrating devices to rapidly move the cannula back and forth.  Both PAL and Ultrasonic methods have been around for several years.  Many do not prefer what they do to the tissue.  Others like what they offer.  Both still preferentially remove fat over gland.  Both make the work of the surgeon easier.  Some feel ultrasonic liposuction can cause more swelling, bruising, and the increase the need for drains.

For me however, they also both remove the feel of the tissue sculpture.  I like the much better control I get with my cannula selection and personally I do not like either ultrasonic nor power assisted techniques.  None of the cases on my website used either PAL or Ultrasonic techniques.  

As any artist, I take my cannula selection very seriously and have evolved what permits me to achieve my results.  I have considered and evaluated many, many technologies.  The many different types of cannula I use have their own advantages and qualities.  I pick a subset of these cannula that varies for the many different types of gynecomastia male chest sculpture that I see.

Gland removal by any technique can still leave a depression when  a major part of the problem is from gland.  For gland removal, I prefer the greater precision of removal under direct visualization and feel.  This also give me access to many more elements for my artistic palette of my dynamic technique to sculpt the remaining tissues.

This approach permits me to maximize the removal of the firm gland and sculpt the remaining fat.  How tissues move is important.  The human body is beautiful in animation.  That is why I show pictures of the chest with arms up, down, and with muscles tight / relaxed in addition to the results from multiple views.  Such analysis of the results as well as how tissues evolve, the possible need for drains, comfort level after surgery, are important factors in picking your doctor.  It is like an artist selecting a paint brush.  The results are what matters, not with what tool they sculpt.

Hope this helps,

Michael Bermant, MD
Learn More About Gynecomastia and Chest Sculpture

« Last Edit: February 05, 2005, 02:27:39 PM by DrBermant »

Offline johnpaullino

  • Posting Member
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Dr Bermant it does help .. Thank You

Offline vaio

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 647
  • Gyne free, is the way to be!
Quote
hey just had my first consultation with a ps. Im 18 had mild gyne for ever. I have a sort of thin length of gland going from the outside of my nipple towards my armpit and gyne fat.
1)The PS said that becuase its only a small amount of gland he would only need to use lipo and not excision- Is this correct??.
2) He said he uses a power canula as opposed to ultrasonic lipo and he makes incisions at the bottom of the breast. Can anyone comment on this technique?

cheeers rob



Bottom of the breast or bottom of the areola??
I believe all gyne should have excision. The lipo only (my ps said) is mainly used for older patients(35+) who don't have gland, just fat. All psedio gyne has gland, that needs to be removed.
$2,800 = Freedom!

http://pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/vaiomanfree/album?.dir=7e36&.src=ph&am p;store=&prodid=&.done=http%3a//pg.photos.yahoo.com/ph/vaiomanfree/my_photos


 

SMFPacks CMS 1.0.3 © 2024