Primarily the is for Alchemist, but anyone else with experience, please chime in.
I spent quite a while poking around on the internet looking for general photos from "naked" vacation spots, trying to see how I would fit in. I saw all sorts of bodies, young, old, in between, thin, normal, and heavy.
The only moobs I saw were on overweight guys - the others all had normal male chests. I really don't see myself fitting in AT ALL if I get to C or larger - unless I gain a LOT of weight. Maybe there guys like that exist, but I can find no evidence of them going naked or topless even. No beach photos, not nudist photos, nothing but the medical before and after photos, and there aren't even many guys at those sites that aren't (or have recently been) extremely overweight.
It doesn't bode well as an option for me.
B
Hi Bummer,
First, you are projecting considerable growth into the future and then catastrophizing on that. As far as the pictures go it's just a matter of learning how to see them and what pictures you look at. First, at any club cameras are restricted. There are no truly candid club pictures. Pictures are with permission only and people who don't want to be photographed aren't. On the walls in the clubhouses are often near whole club pictures often taken on world skinny dipping day. Permission is always polite on nude beaches and sometimes enforced, in the USA at least. "Lurkers" are not tolerated.
Also, pictures are 2D. Breasts not visible head on, ie yours, disappear in a head-on shot. Breasts that can't be seen from the side disappear in side views.
Visibility can depend upon lighting, angle of view and all manner of things. If you want to approach it scientifically, find some of those group nude shots in Europe. There are a batch taken on a glacier for instance. The shadowing lets one judge breast size by shadow size. In some shots, close up you may notice that there are tan lines under women's breasts and under men's. Again the size of the shadowed area indicates the size of the breasts. After talking with you I tried out this method classifying men into G, N or U. With pictures of 10 men or more in them have ranged from G = 0, N = 10 to G = 10, N = 0. That is about what would be expected over a range of pictures in a mixed crowd of ages. Count 1000 pictures and even develop sizing ranges from shadow and tan line clues. It might make a publishable paper.
http: // www. clothesfree.info/forum/photo.php
reassemble the address and paste it in and page through pictures until you find some good ones for counting, with the nudist pictures you will have men and women mixed so comparison is easier. These are mostly non USA pictures.
In American pictures more people are fatter because more people are fatter, which sounds like what you are seeing. Whether it matters or not most of the fat guys have breasts that don't go away with weight loss, they just get smaller. Going from 285 pounds (watery fat) to 200 pounds my cup size came down from DD+ to D. At 220 back to a D+. Do you think a D vs a DD makes any real difference?
At a club you will end up with a more realistic view of bodies. A lot of people are a lot fatter than 30 years ago. And likely you will see no two bodies identical. You will have no idea how the guys with gyne, different from yours, feels about it in the outside world. However, if you watch their body language you will see the ones who automatically hide their breasts from visibility, slump forward and so on and have so far retained their habits.
If you go to a club on a weekday there may not be anybody else there to speak of. A sunny weekend gets the best turnout and likely to give a goodly mix of bodies.