I drove 14 hours round trip to see him for a revisional gyno surgery. I got butchered by a local doctor who turned out to be uncertified despite his assurances to me that he was board certified. I had too much fat liposuctioned from my lower chest. Bermant's procedure to correct this type of defect is to pull fat from the upper chest down to the lower chest to fill in the void. In one breath he told me that he couldn't fix me because I didn't have enough fat on my upper chest to fill the lower chest and then he proceeded to tell me that I was obese and if I lost weight the defect would not look as bad. What? I'm obese but yet I don't have enough fat to do the procedure? For the record, I'm 5'9" and weigh 190. Although I haven't worked out in 18 months, I was a powerlifter for 16 years. His hand held bodyfat analyzer said I was 21% bodyfat. Twenty one percent isn't considered obese. That's just borderline overweight. Anyway, I found a quote from Bermant where he states that he rejects way more patients than he actually operates on. I suspect he has so many people seeking his skill that he cherry picks his patients and refuses any case that is too difficult.
I take on many incredibly difficult cases of gynecomastia and see up to 8 gynecomastia patients a day. It is very common for us to be working with patients from at least 3 different continents each week. That is why I created my
Preliminary Remote Discussion to help minimize travel to Richmond. A few of the many cases I have done are posted on my website. It has been these difficult cases that stimulated me to evolve new techniques to tackle such problems.
There are unfortunately limitations as to what
Revision Gynecomastia Surgery has to offer. When someone is "sucked dry" by "a local doctor who turned out to be uncertified" and most of the tissue between the skin and the chest removed, options are sometimes limited. For reconstruction, local resources of fat can be critical for a natural result. When there is nearby fat,
Fat Flap Surgery can be advanced into the defect filling in the void of a
Crater Deformity Complication. However when most of the chest is involved, there is just not enough local fat for this option.
While an overweight individual might have more fat available, this is not a good choice to obtain reconstructive resources. There is only so far a fat flap can be pushed. Adding the extra weight will increase the difference in height of the remaining fat and the deepest aspects of the deformity. Losing body fat can narrow the differences between the crater edge and the deeper components. However, the extended scar adherence deformity on animation remains.
Some doctors like fat grafts to fill in craters. However, I have
never seen a result from any surgeon that the fat moved naturally on the chest. Fat grafts need to get a new blood supply unlike my fat flaps that already are supplied. Fat grafts tend to get firm, just like the firm gland that causes such distortion on the male chest - especially on animation. Watching such fat graft reconstruction move, looks terrible sometimes worse than the original problem.
I can understand your disappointment. Perhaps you should consider directing your anger at the doctor who made the mess instead of the doctor who took the time to explain why he did not have anything to offer. That is why surgeon choice is so important. Primary Surgery is the best opportunity to come up with the good result.
I just added this topic: How to Choose A Gynecomastia Surgeon here in this forum
http://www.gynecomastia.org/smf/index.php?topic=16474and check out the reference to another bad choice of a Radiologist who told people he was a cosmetic surgeon / plastic surgeon:
http://www.gynecomastia.org/smf/index.php?topic=16457.msg114733;topicseen#msg114733Hope this helps,
Michael Bermant, MD
Learn More About Gynecomastia and Male Breast Reduction