hey guys
my first post! am wondering if anybody has seen this new treatment? neopac? in the trial stage right now. just says for women! do you think it might work 'filling-in' concavities for us poor souls who've had bad ops? had my op (on one side) over five years ago and have been thinking about saving up for more surgery. . . think my concavity is so deep and creased that there is not much point though, not much any surgeon could do, etc. . . this neopac stuff sounds promising though. http://www.nydailynews.com/lifestyle/health/2009/11/13/2009-11-13_new_breastgrowing_technique_neopac_may_offer_alternative_to_implants.html. still v early. might be years and years away. maybe other non-invasive methods like this are being developed for female reconstructions . . . seems like a possible solution, though (really don't want to go under again considering my first.) so, neopac. any other guys who got concavity seen this? thoughts please.
best all
Vascularized fat transfers by microvascular surgery is not new, we were performing such breast reconstructions 25 years ago. One of my mentors, Bill Shaw pioneered the techniques. The problem is where the fat comes from, the donor site. Places on the body where fat can be harvested with an attached blood supply for a female breast are the buttocks and the layer of fat in the belly omentum. The scars and defects for a female breast are such that the donor site deformity would be worse than the
Crater Deformity on the chest. While the amount of fat needed for a male crater would be less, the buttocks muscle needed to support the flap would make a terrible bulge. For the belly, the injury inside the abdomen carries its own complications. When remote donor site of vascularized fat become available, perhaps with tissue engineering, this would be an ideal tool. We were dreaming of it back then. Nothing has evolved yet to give us such a resource. For now I have my
Vascularized Fat Flaps which will work for a subset of the population that have not had their local resources destroyed by over aggressive removal.
Fat grafts need to get a new blood supply. Some of the fat graft dies in the transfer process which makes the remaining fat firm and dense like gland. I have yet to see a decent documentation of a successful crater deformity managed this way on a male chest. By decent documentation I mean, exam of actual patient, movies of motion, or at least pictures showing pectoral muscles flexed and arms over head. Filling with something firm that looks OK at rest is fine for a hype website advertisement or a paper in a journal. But that does not make a chest look good in a swimming pool, playing basketball or volleyball shirtless!
Dreamers and hope spring eternally. Someday such options may happen. I saw a demonstration of future potential technology of turning back on cells to regrow and tissue frameworks made in the lab (but these were not vascularized). 25 years later, we are still not there yet.
Hope this helps,
Michael Bermant, MD
Learn More About Revision Gynecomastia and Chest Surgery