Hello this is a question I was meaning to ask months ago,
Wondering about whether there is a 'norm' for placement of entry points for lipo on chest and how many are sufficient - originally told 3 on each side would be done, however have 2 entry points on both side. left hand - one near bottom of breast roughly an inch under nipple a tad to right and one above at top of chest. But on right just two on bottom - none on top. the placements are random don't follow a symmetry and apparently my procedure only took 15 minutes according to parent, was it rushed? Not that that this even matters i guess rather open ended question I know, but playing on mind for a while though. Another question is how important is massaging the area, i may have been a little slack. Its now 7 months later
I prefer to have only one incision for each side, and place that at the edge of the areola where scars hide better on the chest. Other independent liposuction access points just do not hide well and look like added scars on the chest. When putting extra scars elsewhere, staggering them so they do not look symmetrical gives a slightly less operated look. Two extra liposuction access points on each side make the case go the fastest and make it easier to lessen the chance of contour problems by coming at the tissue from two different directions.
Merging the center left and right extra incisions means an incision at the center of the chest, where the body tends to scar the most. In trying to minimize such external extra scars, I combined all of them years ago to one incision at the edge of the areola. This incision has gotten smaller and smaller over the years and currently measures 1.6cm or 0.6 inch. Now having this incision at the edge of the areola makes the liposuction component more challenging and demanding. It becomes an exercise in sculpting skill to achieve a great contour with less obvious surface scars. I my opinion, well worth the effort to knock off the more visible extra incisions. Unfortunately, this can be difficult for many surgeons. Performing liposuction at the areola incision point requires unusual dexterity and the right choice of liposuction cannula (I use several different types depending my sculpting needs.)
I am fortunate being ambidextrous, I can use scalpel, sew, cut, and perform liposuction with either my left or right hand. That means I do not have to bend way over my patient nor have the wrong hand available when working on the left or right side of the patient. Some of my athletes and bodybuilders have extremely wide chests and without being both handed, this would be much more difficult with only the one incision.
This central incision is part of the theme of my approach to the surgery, how the results look on animation. Leaving gland behind just does not look good when flexing the body or when the areola presses down against the underlying tissues. Documenting the results first with flexing and arms up overhead pictures and then with video led me to better understand that targeting gland first was just better. Since I was making this incision, why then add additional liposuction incisions? Or for that matter, if on many cases the incision is needed to go after "resistant" gland, why then end up with both the remote incisions and the areola incision? Even under arm incisions do not hide well when playing sports.
There are rare exceptions. Drains do not do well at the edge of the areola. So for my unusual patient needing a drain, then a remote incision is needed on that side. Beyond that occasionally, about once every 3-4 years, I get a case where the fat or scar tissue from prior surgery is just so dense that I need a remote incision to finish the liposuction.
The other much more common exception is my revision gynecomastia surgery. In that case, I use a much longer scar when trying to repair and revise the deformity at the surface. Unfortunately scars cannot be erased, only replaced by new scars. In such cases, the surface incision tends to be so much longer than my typical cases because leaving the old step off or deformed surface scar would look worse than revising it. During revision cases, the liposuction becomes so much easier, but the time saved then gets used up for a much longer surface sculpture repair.
The validity of technique and surgeon's reason for using it is best investigated with seeing how it looks and moves. I want my patients to look good both with arms at their sides, and while living life, swimming, playing sports, and with muscles flexing.
Hope this helps,
Michael Bermant, M.D.Board CertifiedAmerican Board of Plastic Surgery
Member:
American Society of Plastic Surgeons and
American Society of Aesthetic Plastic SurgeonsSpecializing in Gynecomastia and Surgical Sculpture of the Male Chest(804) 748-7737