This is a important question. Most plastic surgeons have a rather minimal amount of exposure with gynecomastia as residents often in morbidly obese patients. These surgeons once done with their residency see a minimal number or no individuals with gynecomastia over the course of their careers.Very few doctors in the United States see a substantial number of cases of gynecomastia over the course of their careers let alone devote a majority of their practice to the problem.
At present the best answer to your question comes from that great 20th century philosopher Will Rogers who once aptly said "Good judgement comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgement."
Thank you for the response
Dr. Pensler. You have confirmed what I was beginning to suspect.
Many things in the computer programing industry are like this where a self taught programer knows more about programing then someone with a degree in programing from a good college due to lack of documentation and instructions . It would be nice if this issue was at very least covered when getting board certified process. You would think all the extra years of training would dedicate maybe a few hour to gynecomastia and preventing a creator defect/nipple depression. Perhaps published this information in a medical journal for plastic surgery may help improve the profession.
Unfortunately, this makes things much more difficult for the patient trying to evaluate a good doctor to perform gynecomastia surgery.
Are you able to put into words or quantify what steps that a doctor should take to minimize the risk of a creator defect, nipple depression outcome ?
As a patient, I can look up doctors who have gone to good medical schools, have board certified by the American board of plastic surgery, talk about gynecomastia on their website, have no issue with the state medical board or good ratings on various groups however I simple don't know how to evaluate if the doctor knows how to prevent a creator defect.
They are likely to filter these picture from their before & after pictures and only display the patients who have had favorable outcomes.
I need a way to either test potential doctors or inform a doctor how to prevent a creator defect so I will not be one of the unlucky people with this post surgery deformity. I think we can all agree that its easier to prevent the problem from the beginning than try to fix it afterwards.
My sense is that there are maybe 3 ways that a creator defect can be prevented or minimized but please correct
1. Leaving a small amount of gland attacked to the underside of the areola to provide structural support
2. Creating fat flaps under the areola to provide structural support.
3. Feathering the fat under the area in such a way that there there is a level and even surface instead of a large crater.( However not sure if this method would prevent the nipple depression/crease from occurring)
Please tell me if I am wrong here or if I am right but missing elements?