Hi Bummed,
I am comparing similarity in the extremity of reaction; PTSD and/or body dysmorphic disorder. For the reactive women with the subjectively abnormal labia it is the same fear of being seen by a potential sexual partner as many of the guys here have expressed about being seen by their girlfriend or wife or whoever. It doesn't include being seen by the public at large but we are not talking something rationally considered.
So where on the normal distribution curve of male breast size does the "normal" become abnormal; 10th percentile, 30th percentile, 50th percentile (dead average), 90th percentile or 95th percentile (2 standard deviations)?
Actually many of the ladies with substantially enlarged labia won't go to the beach or pool because their labia can be seen through the bathing suit as can a large penis, or breasts through a shirt.
Just as the degree of psychological discomfort with puffy nipples or even the thought that they might have some gyne that is so small and subtle if any that they have to ask if they have it, and are already upset about it and behaving as if they had some D, DD, E, F, G, H cup size breasts already attached clearly doesn't relate to size.
Visible labia doesn't bother you but visible breasts do. The irrational fear, and up to PTSD and body Dysmorphic Disorder inspired by possibly visible breasts, even just nipples, even just plain nipples that are not even puffy, just not flat, or of possibly visible labia, well under 50th percentile in size, is what we are talking about. Breasts on men are not abnormal or as many as 50-70% wouldn't have them. When somebody who has breasts that are just not flat as a board, 10th percentile in size perhaps, are cause for irrational fear and surgery, there is something wrong. And similar things happen with labia. The approximate counts of surgeries look similar 5 to 10 years ago for both, and increasing rapidly. Due to lagging or no reporting it is hard to know surgical rates, but appears to afflict about the same percentage of young ladies.
What makes it similar is the similar huge and desperate reaction to a NORMAL variation of size. Something that predictably happens to 50-70% of men isn't abnormal; either that or it is defining 30% who don't as the only normal men which is a very abnormal definition of "normal". I have sat around a pool and have seen a sizable percentage, 30% or 40% of men have breasts up to some measurable cup size, but only 10% or so are flat as a board, whatever that flesh consists of. The appearance of breasts can be muscle and fat with varying degrees of gland growth. In an autopsy study 70% of men had breast gland growth. Most men grow up from being flat as a board boys and fill out in the chest. However, not even all the flat as a board boys have nipples that never have piloerection. Some have piloerection of nipples almost all the time. Some get very upset about that as if they have sizable breasts.