Hey guys,
Im looking into getting an op done to remove gland tissue via an armpit incision mainly because the scars are not visible under the armpit.
Many people have had good results but some people say incisions from the armpit to remove gland is not effective. My doc plans to remove it with special tools not lipo where he pulls the gland from a 1cm -1.5cm incision under the armpit and cuts it up with special instruments. Can this cause more tissue scaring than an incision done on the areola? the doctor i will have it with is Paul Levick who is very well known in the uk for this type of surgery. i asked if its effective he said if it wasnt as effective an an areola incision i would not do it. Any help guys? anyone had gland removed via an armpit incision?
Id its done this way can it still get rid of puffy nipples? i assume what causes puffy nipple is the gland so whether its taken from an incision under the armpit or areola makes no difference aslong as the surgeon takes out most of it right? its only a problem where he/she doesnt take out all the gland any help docs/people who have had it or anyone who has info?? thanks
Under Arm Incisions Require Sculpture from a remote location and depending on either liposuction or long fine cutting tools. Some doctors may try the remote location first and then add additional scars by the areola. I prefer to limit the scars on the surface and internally. Two surface scars are much better than 4 or more.
I have seen just too many unhappy patients with puffy nipples remaining after axilla or armpit attempts alone using sharp cutting cannula or other such instruments by other doctors. Check out this drawing of
Puffy Nipple Anatomy after Remote Gland Removal Drawing.
I have also seen patients with channel problems between remote access sites and the areola / nipple. Scars, adhesions, and depressions can look terrible. Check out the lateral (side views) and posterior oblique (side from the back views with and without muscle flexion
here to see what I mean.
For a liposuction cannula to remove gland, it can also remove connective tissue and other structures which can lead to more bruising and scars. I have seen so many patients who were unhappy from doctors that used "special cannula to remove gland," that I just prefer to go directly to the problem itself. Primary surgery is usually better than needing a revision. All male breasts have gland. With access to the gland directly, I can peel it off the areola muscle, minimize bruising and bleeding with direct control of the tiny blood vessels, and then reconstruct the contour.
The incision at the edge of the areola opens up my entire spectrum of artist's pallet of tools for my sculpture. A remote incision robs me of many options and just does not looks as nice. I prefer to avoid this unnecessary additional scar. Gland removal by any technique can still leave a depression when a major part of the problem is from gland. For gland removal, I prefer the greater precision of removal under direct visualization and feel. This also give me access to many more elements for my artistic palette of my
Dynamic Technique to sculpt the remaining tissues.
This approach permits me to maximize the removal of the firm gland and sculpt the remaining fat. How tissues move is important. The human body is beautiful in animation. Scars to be considered include the sculpted tissues, yes the entire zone operated on. That is why I show pictures of the chest with arms up, down, and with muscles tight / relaxed in addition to the results from multiple views. Such analysis of the results as well as how tissues evolve, the possible need for drains, comfort level after surgery, are important factors in picking your doctor. It is like an artist selecting a paint brush. The results are what matters, not with what tool they sculpt.
Hope this helps,
Michael Bermant, MD
Learn More aboutGynecomastia and Chest Sculpture