Author Topic: Frequent Growth Spurts?  (Read 16035 times)

Online WPW717

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 480
Tax,

Heard from the doc / geneticist re the results ?
 Not large at 50+ ?
My goodness, at nearly 51 inches I feel large. I have very large base & am extremely wide set, thereby leaving me with an ability to camouflage easily. Under bust is 44. 
I can sense the rapid growth of the last 4 years is over but the zero T and low dose E bone prophylaxis patch is going to reveal more boob in the future.
The brain, mood, & and emotional changes are more evident to me. My wife noticed them too, and some of her friends have mentioned them to her.
Life is a crapshoot like grandma used to say… ‘Do you want to play ?’ Makes more sense to me now than in the 1950’s.
Regards, Bob

Online taxmapper

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 887
I have the band size at 44-46.  (Depending on water retention).   

But yeah they are not folding over and making the large bulbus shape as of yet. They look more like a 20 something bust.
   
Chromosomes: 

Chromosome results from Feb. 2025: Karyotype: ,XY INTERPRETATION: Male Chromosomal complement with no abnormalities detected within the limits of the band level. 

This standard cytogenetic methodology does not detect low level mosaicism or subtle structural rearrangement, or molecular cytogenetic abnormalities (such as microdeletions and microduplications). 

Clinical Indications: Gynecomastia Specimen source: 

Peripheral blood Culture(s) : PEA-stimulated 72 hours # of Metaphases Examined: 20 # of Metaphases Analyzed: 6 # of metaphases Karyotyped: 3 Banding Method: GTW Resolution: 575 bands AFP: Timor marker: <8.4 ng/mL hCG, serum, quantitative B-HCG, Quant. <2miU/mL Macroprolactin Monometric Prolactin 9.5 ng/mL Pct Monometric Prolactin 84.8 % Prolactin Total 11.2 ng/mL Prolactin 11.2 Estradiol 18.6 Prolactin 16.1 FSH 9.6 LH 7.2


They say i am full male from a surface level but didn't deep dive.  I also don't think they want to or will. 

A metaphor:  

The results are still very unusual though given the SHBG and lower Testosterone. So though the chromosomes say I am fully male, they only looked into the tank and saw blue, but didn't put a probe in to find out what kind of critters are swimming inside. 

Moods are very different now, with occasional testosterone spikes that are not pleasant.  But they are getting fewer and fewer.  

Never realized the effect of testosterone before and now don't want it. Give me the girl side!   I cant stand the effects of the boymones.    

Offline Sophie

  • Silver Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 240
I had always had a low T high E ratio. When I had my orchiectomy, I was not recommended to do any HRT for almost a full year. After that I was prescribed the Estrodile patch and I apply a new one to either my belly or bottom every 3 days. The emotional changes were and are welcome. I also filled out a bit more on the upper regions of my breasts which was also welcome. 

♥️Sophie♥️

Online WPW717

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 480
Gotcha on the testosterone rollercoaster, with this MEN 4 syndrome I would spike the T then  Run down to zero in a few days and the T/E ratio would be very labile. Wasn’t fun at all . Went on for years until handle was put on the cause. I was not happy or fun. As Sophie said the E patch has made it smooth sailing  after the orchiectomy. The boys were becoming apoptotic and had to go. I am sure my pituitary gland got tired too. 
The initial genetic tests revealed no cause for the clinical symptoms but a more in depth secondary one provided the answer of a mutation in the CHEK 2 gene. Not as well investigated as the HER &  BRCA  breast cancer genes. But is known for PNET tumors.                   ( neuroendocrine tumors)

I got lucky as this syndrome is as common as Unicorn feathers.

Maybe some new docs that with will explore further?

Online taxmapper

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 887
Not in New Mexico.. they push Trans this and Trans that, but its all pedophilia masked as 'reproductive care."  (Not making this up.)  

The doctors who are more normal dont want to touch this sort of thing with a 10 foot pole.    I dont hold anything against someone doing any trans themselves, but the approach is so completely off the board that there are real problems with both arguments.  its not addressing the core issues including biological diversity.  

Additionally, the actions by the Gov. in regards to medical liability and various mandatory insurance processes has made it impossible for doctors to survive in the state. 

I dont want to make this political, but elections have consequences and not entirely what you think, or believe.  

Online WPW717

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 480
Sophie,
Towards the end of the four years I was without any hormone, male or female for over 18 months. I felt flat and like I was in molasses most of the time.
Went on Etradiol patch low dose at 0.25 micro grams every day release rate. Too late, osteoporosis had set in.
I was NOT happy as I was calling attention to this probability especially since a parathyroid tumor manifested.
What an impressive improvement.
My diagnostic and prognostic skills have not atrophied in the least.Eight 
years since I retired The doctors around here seem to be the dregs from medical schools, it was never this way 25 years ago. NCCN Guidelines state the need for yearly mammograms, but the radiologist here will not perform them. Not sure if I’m a victim of a Medicare rule or stupidity.
I am however, experiencing some mild growth sensations after six months on the patch. E2 level is only 24 to 26 PG per DL. at my age being stealth is not a great importance. and getting my lightheartedness and joy and living life may prompt me to get some lace when I move to the  hot & humid south.

Tax … 
is Bill Richardson still your governor?
And are you on Medicare or a private insurance plan?
Your case shouldn’t seem so hopeless if you could get into a university, teaching hospital facility, perhaps out of state. I am facing the difficulty of finding some astute doctors in Tennessee, where we’re moving in a few months, it’s never fun trying to find a doctor to listen.
I hope you have the wherewithal to keep pursuing answers to your dilemma.

Online taxmapper

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 887
Richardson is dead.    

Our current Gov. is Michelle Lujan Grisham.  

MLG as we affectionally call her, got her political start in the NM Dept. of health and Human Services.  She is the quincuncial political hack. 

Some back story:  

MLG is referred to by members of her family as "The Firecracker".  And she hates it!  

When she started at the NMDOH (Now the Dept. of Health and human Services) , she wound up as the Director of the Agency on Aging from 1991 to 2002.  During this time it was told to me by multiple people who worked with and for her that she began to take on the persona of health advocacy and started acting like she knew medicine. 

Then she held under Richardson: Secretary of Health, a position she held from 2004 to 2007. 

She DOES NOT HOLD A MEDICAL DEGREE!!  She holds a JD from the University of New Mexico School of Law.  

She THINKS she knows medicine, but is the typical political know it all who wants to control medicine in the state.  

She was elected Gov. in 2018 after her stent as US House Rep.   

Why this matters:

During COVID MLG locked down the state and mandated masks for nearly three years. She created literal bread lines and in Nov. of 2020 there were literal lines of people wanting to shop Wal mart that stretched around the corner literally looking like Soviet Russia. She also treated us as such. 

Her response to COVID was proportionally WORSE than California in per capita, over the fact that CA had more deaths in raw numbers. 

She destroyed the NM economy and small business.   Then, during the COVID scare, she had the state legislature meet in remote Zoom like calls. During this time the public had little to no access (violation of the open meetings act) and they passed a number of laws related to medical issues. 

In 2021, New Mexico enacted House Bill 75, amending the Medical Malpractice Act to raise the cap on medical malpractice damages for independent healthcare providers from $600,000 to $750,000, plus medical expenses, with annual cost-of-living adjustments starting in 2023. For hospitals and hospital-affiliated outpatient facilities, the cap was set at $4 million in 2022, increasing by $500,000 annually until reaching $6 million in 2026. 
These changes led to significant hikes in malpractice insurance premiums for independent providers. For example, annual premiums for some specialties rose from $32,000 to over $60,000 between 2021 and 2022. In response, Senate Bill 523 was introduced and signed into law in 2023, capping malpractice payouts for independent outpatient clinics at $1 million. This adjustment aimed to make malpractice insurance more affordable for these providers

The problem was that it drove doctors out of the state. I can only see the Endo once every 6 months. She is based outside the state and is following a Health Provider plan established by Pres. Health and the State to bring more doctors into the state. 32 of the states 33 counties are considered to be in a "Health Care Provider" crisis because of the laws 

This from AI:  

A commonly referenced benchmark for primary care provider availability is a population-to-provider ratio of 3,500:1. This means one primary care provider for every 3,500 individuals. Ratios exceeding this threshold may indicate a shortage of healthcare professionals. NM-IBIS+1NM-IBIS+1NM-IBIS

As of 2021, New Mexico's overall ratio of primary care physicians to the population was approximately 1,340:1, meaning there was one primary care physician for every 1,340 residents. This ratio is slightly higher than the national average of 1,320:1, indicating a marginally lower availability of primary care physicians in the state compared to the national average.  County Health Rankings & Roadmaps

However, it's important to note that physician distribution within New Mexico is uneven. Some counties face more significant shortages, while others have more favorable ratios. For example, certain counties may have ratios as high as 3,530:1, while others may have ratios as low as 600:1.


Thus, primary care in NM has taken a massive hit, lower care quality, poor service and limited resource availability.   


NONE OF THIS existed prior to 2018.   
 




Online WPW717

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 480
WOW

Nice amount of details. It harkens to the fact that we are leaving Washington State due to gov’t ineptitude. Won’t rant into details but suffice it to say that the intrusion of the state is into every aspect of life here. And each step has the effect of taking money from the people. Health care suffers too.
Are you retired or working, possible for you to move out of state?
   My wife still has to buy insurance from the state and it’s crumbling in quality. Tennessee will be better as I am retired, property taxes alone who down about $4000 per annum. Amazing I got a difficult Dx here but then I pushed hard and ruffled a few feathers. I was not your basic RN . I was an old school nurse with lots of extra educational chops. They hated that, current doc understood this and went down the path I suggested and was surprised every step on the way.
We’re moving on, can you? ( for your health )

Online taxmapper

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 887
I am still working in local Gov. and really cant do much for some time. 

Poss. in a year or so the winds may change. 
But massive reforms are badly needed and despite some feelings on this forum over politics, i so badly wish the Trump effect would take place in NM.  We literally and I am not making this up, ranked 52nd in school education!  coming in behind DC and Mississippi. with the DoD schools atop the list pushing us literally tot he bottom.   We are actually 53rd if you throw in Puerto Rico, and 54th if you put in the Oceana colonies in the Pacific. 

from the net:  

In 2024, New Mexico ranked 50th in education, according to the Annie E. Casey Foundation's KIDS COUNT Data Book. This ranking places New Mexico just above Mississippi, which ranked 49th, and Louisiana, which ranked 48th in education.


I point this out because I know alot of folks are talking about and suffering some similar situations.  
but there is one thing that separates NM out from the rest of the country: 

Income. 

Reported household hits an average of 68K a year. Remove Los Alamos County and it drops significantly to around 59-60K.  

But that's gross, not net actual take home. With our high tax rates this amount quickly drops to around 30K an year actual income.   Go do the math! 

Online WPW717

  • Gold Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 480
Supposedly we are 26 th. HUGE disparity from the Microsofties in Seattle districts to rural eastern Washington and county I live in. Just got the road from our town to the county seat paved 9 years ago. Only state   & federal roads in this country are paved. 60% of students cannot read at grade level. Not much better than NM. We are on a steep decline.
Bottom 35% earn $20500 to $34500
yearly income.
Seattle skews the overall state statistics in a positive direction. But it’s really beginning to suck in the eastern 2/3 rds of the state.

Online Justagirl💃

  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1505
  • When life gives you curves, Flaunt them! 🤗
Hmm, the Telltale soreness behind the nipples suggests my breasts are not done growing yet. I have also noticed a much fuller look especially since they were lactating last month. 😊
When life gives you curves,
flaunt them! 💃
💋Birdie💋


 

SMFPacks CMS 1.0.3 © 2025